Deaths of innocents are devastating, whether those who die are in Boston, New York, Pakistan, or Yemen.
What happened at the Boston Marathon last week was horrifying. Were it not for the heroism of first responders and medical professionals, as well as bystanders, the death toll would have likely been much higher. Legions of workaday folks, without missing a beat, reflexively transformed into angels of mercy, while potentially placing themselves in harm's way.
In the wake of tragedy, the community came together. So did the nation in a great display of empathy. It's a solid testament to our national character.
But can we extend that empathy across the globe? Consider this: Farea al-Muslimi, a Yemeni writer, recently testified before a Senate subcommittee hearing focused on the use of attack drones overseas. Mr. al-Muslimi was once an exchange student, living with a family in the U.S. Since then, he's assumed a role as a de-facto good-will ambassador between Yemen and the U.S. with much success.
Sadly, recent ongoing U.S. drone attacks on Yemen seem to have undone his good work. Mr. al-Muslimi described his shock at such attacks on his native land --- in particular one on his native village --- and emphasized that the good will he so carefully cultivated is now history. In fact, he's quite concerned that he may not even be welcomed if he was to return. Here's what he said at the hearing:
The drone strikes tore through my heart, much as
the tragic bombings in Boston tore your hearts
and also mine.
He went on to say that the target of the strike was known to many in the village; Yemeni officials could easily have arrested him. Mr. al-Muslimi further stated:
The drone strikes are the face of America to many
Yemenis. .... (This allows the Yemen-based Al
Qaeda affiliate) to convince more individuals that
America is at war with them.
And Yemen is not the only nation being subjected to U.S. drone warfare. Parts of Pakistan and Somalia are among others. Because U.S. troops are not at risk, it's easy for us to "file and forget" reports of such missions. We're often reminded that drones are capable of making "surgical strikes" on their intended targets; yet in reality, many innocents --- including children --- are often killed or gravely injured. Defenders of the use of drones often gracelessly refer to such tragic consequences as "collateral damage".
It should also be noted that the surviving brother accused of the Boston massacre, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, stated that he and his brother were driven to act by their anger toward the United States for having waged war against Muslims in Iraq and Afghanistan. While this rationale in no way justifies their monstrous deed, it's probably not unreasonable to assume that another "Dzhokhar" or "Tamerlan" from Yemen or Pakistan might be inspired to exact a bloody revenge on the U.S. with a similar act.
The Obama administration has been accelerating the drone program. For example, in 2012 there were 46 drone attacks in Yemen alone. Under Bush's watch, there was only one. The President journeyed to Boston soon after the tragedy to offer comfort and solace to the grieving families of those who died, as well as to the injured. I'm sure that everything he said and did came from the heart.
But he needs to realize that those who've suffered as a result of drone warfare have experienced that same heartache and sense of loss as the people of Boston. He must make that connection!
A very well done post here, one which I
ReplyDeleteagree with completely. Do not all humans
bleed? Do not all humans cry? Why should
we care any less about any human suffering, ESPECIALLY any caused by our government, ostensibly in our names?
Dan, I had to follow you on this matter, but I did
ReplyDeletementioned this post specifically as a P.S. on my
latest entry.